Goodman Fielder Pte Ltd v Conga Foods Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1808
The Court found the respondents' cross claim for full rectification failed under s 41 but succeeded under ss 59 and 92(4) to the extent of removing from the register those goods for which the applicants lacked intention to use, specifically excising the general foodstuffs category from the relevant marks. The marks otherwise survived rectification as the applicants established intention to use and actual use for bread and related products. The respondents' use of 'La Famiglia Rana' was held to be deceptively similar to the applicants' marks and used on goods of the same description (filled pasta), establishing infringement under s 120(2). The respondents' argument for a statutory defence...
- Parties
- Applicant / First Cross Respondent: Goodman Fielder Pte Ltd; Second Applicant / Second Cross Respondent: La Famiglia Fine Foods Pty Ltd; First Respondent / First Cross Claimant: Conga Foods Pty Ltd; Second Respondent / Second Cross Claimant: Pastificio Rana SPA
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Trade Mark Rectification and Infringement Proceedings / Final Judgment on Liability and Rectification
- Outcome
- Partial rectification of the register to narrow the goods for which the trade marks are registered; trade mark infringement established; directions for draft orders and further hearing on consequential matters.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Marks, Rectification of Register, Infringement, Non Use, Distinctiveness, Discretion in Rectification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Goodman Fielder Pte Ltd
Applicant / First Cross Respondent
La Famiglia Fine Foods Pty Ltd
Second Applicant / Second Cross Respondent
Conga Foods Pty Ltd
First Respondent / First Cross Claimant
Pastificio Rana SPA
Second Respondent / Second Cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Trade Mark Rectification and Infringement Proceedings / Final Judgment on Liability and Rectification
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondents are entitled to rectification of the register of trade marks under Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 59, 92(4), for lack of intention to use or non-use
- 2 Whether applicants' trade marks lack capacity to distinguish under s 41
- 3 Whether respondents' use of 'La Famiglia Rana' infringed the applicants' trade marks under s 120
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the respondents' cross claim for full rectification failed under s 41 but succeeded under ss 59 and 92(4) to the extent of removing from the register those goods for which the applicants lacked intention to use, specifically excising the general foodstuffs category from the relevant marks. The marks otherwise survived rectification as the applicants established intention to use and actual use for bread and related products. The respondents' use of 'La Famiglia Rana' was held to be deceptively similar to the applicants' marks and used on goods of the same description (filled pasta), establishing infringement under s 120(2). The respondents' argument for a statutory defence...
Court Disposition
Partial rectification of the register to narrow the goods for which the trade marks are registered; trade mark infringement established; directions for draft orders and further hearing on consequential matters.
Orders
- The parties to confer and provide proposed short minutes of order to chambers by 4.00pm on 1 February 2021 to give effect to the Court's reasons, include any proposed suppression orders or redactions.
- Proceeding listed for case management hearing at 9.30am on 5 February 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment