REA Group Ltd v Real Estate 1 Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 968
The Court found the first and second respondents infringed the applicants' registered trade marks by using 'realestate1.com.au' and 'realcommercial1.com.au' as domain names and marks for online real estate advertising services, and granted specific declaratory and injunctive relief, including transfer of domain names. Due to the mixed success (failure on misleading/deceptive conduct, passing off, and accessory liability claims), the applicants were awarded 70% of their costs. The injunctions were limited to restraining use of the specific marks found to be infringing, rather than broader statutory language covering similar marks.
- Parties
- First Applicant: REA Group Ltd; Second Applicant: Realestate.com.au Pty Limited; First Respondent: Real Estate 1 Ltd; Second Respondent: Sixteen Blamey Pty Ltd; Third Respondent: Geoffrey Luff; Fourth Respondent: Julie Luff; Fifth Respondent: Christian Ongarello; Sixth Respondent: Bianca Ongarello
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Trade Mark Infringement and Associated Relief in the Federal Court of Australia / Post Trial Orders on Relief and Costs
- Outcome
- Declarations of trade mark infringement and orders for transfer of infringing domain names and permanent injunctions against first and second respondents. Costs apportioned, with first and second respondents to pay 70% of applicants' costs; no order as to costs in respect of third to sixth respondents; other parts...
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Remedies, Injunctions, Declaratory Relief, Transfer of Domain Names, Costs Apportionment, Passing Off, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
REA Group Ltd
First Applicant
Realestate.com.au Pty Limited
Second Applicant
Real Estate 1 Ltd
First Respondent
Sixteen Blamey Pty Ltd
Second Respondent
Geoffrey Luff
Third Respondent
Julie Luff
Fourth Respondent
Christian Ongarello
Fifth Respondent
Bianca Ongarello
Sixth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Trade Mark Infringement and Associated Relief in the Federal Court of Australia / Post Trial Orders on Relief and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first and second respondents infringed the applicants' registered trade marks by using similar marks in domain names and advertising for online real estate services
- 2 Whether declaratory relief should be granted when infringing conduct stopped before proceedings started
- 3 Whether orders should require transfer of infringing domain names to the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the first and second respondents infringed the applicants' registered trade marks by using 'realestate1.com.au' and 'realcommercial1.com.au' as domain names and marks for online real estate advertising services, and granted specific declaratory and injunctive relief, including transfer of domain names. Due to the mixed success (failure on misleading/deceptive conduct, passing off, and accessory liability claims), the applicants were awarded 70% of their costs. The injunctions were limited to restraining use of the specific marks found to be infringing, rather than broader statutory language covering similar marks.
Court Disposition
Declarations of trade mark infringement and orders for transfer of infringing domain names and permanent injunctions against first and second respondents. Costs apportioned, with first and second respondents to pay 70% of applicants' costs; no order as to costs in respect of third to sixth respondents; other parts...
Orders
- Declarations of infringement of trade marks no. 811931, 1075935 and 933123 by first and second respondents using 'realestate1.com.au' and 'realcommercial1.com.au'
- Order for first and second respondents to transfer domain names 'www.realestate1.com.au' and 'www.realcommercial1.com.au' to first applicant within 30 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment