Nemorin v Pierre [2013] FCA 337
Given the parties resolved the proceeding by consent and in light of the limited evidence and absence of hearing on the merits, it was not appropriate to grant declaratory relief; injunctive and forfeiture orders were appropriate as consented by the parties; as to costs, the Respondents to pay the Applicants' costs from 18 September 2012, Applicants to pay Respondents' costs of a directions hearing, otherwise as consented, reflecting the absence of a trial and the parties' reasonable conduct.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Application (amended) / Resolved by Consent Before Hearing on the Merits
- Outcome
- Proceeding resolved by consent; orders made as per parties' agreement
- Legal Topics
- ['trade Marks' 'costs' 'injunction' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Originating Application (amended) / Resolved by Consent Before Hearing on the Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Respondents infringed Applicants' Australian Registered Trade Mark No 1430338" 'Whether injunctive or declaratory relief should be granted' 'Whether trade mark was registered in bad faith' 'Appropriate orders as to forfeiture of seized goods and costs']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the parties resolved the proceeding by consent and in light of the limited evidence and absence of hearing on the merits, it was not appropriate to grant declaratory relief; injunctive and forfeiture orders were appropriate as consented by the parties; as to costs, the Respondents to pay the Applicants' costs from 18 September 2012, Applicants to pay Respondents' costs of a directions hearing, otherwise as consented, reflecting the absence of a trial and the parties' reasonable conduct.
Court Disposition
Proceeding resolved by consent; orders made as per parties' agreement
Orders
- ["Respondents restrained by consent from importing/distributing in Australia, without Applicants' authority, goods displaying specified Mauritius trade mark (No 07019/2009)." 'Respondents by consent to ensure forfeiture to the Commonwealth of all goods in Australian Customs and Border Protection Service pursuant to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment