Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v KLALC Property & Investment & Anor [2006] NSWSC 863
For the reasons given in Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v KLALC Property & Investment Pty Ltd & Anor [2006] NSWSC 856 and, as to authority to transfer lot 11, in Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v CKT Developments Pty Ltd & Anor [2006] NSWSC 862, the Council was not entitled to relief. LKM was not entitled to judgment in any sum against the Council, but was entitled to orders requiring the Council and the Registrar-General to withdraw their caveats over lot 11; the remaining cross claims were to be dismissed except for further argument on possession and judicial sale against the Trustee.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Supreme Court of New South Wales Equity Division Proceedings Concerning Aboriginal Land, Transfer, Mortgage and Caveats / Judgment After Hearing; Further Argument Reserved on Possession, Judicial Sale, Appropriate Orders and Costs
- Outcome
- Council's proceedings to be dismissed; LKM entitled to orders that the Council and Registrar-General withdraw their caveats; cross claims otherwise to be dismissed, with further argument on possession, judicial sale, formal orders and costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['transfer of Land Acquired Under the Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983' 'authority of Local Aboriginal Land Council to Transfer Land' 'mortgage Over Land' 'caveats' 'joint Venture Development Agreement' 'loan Agreement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Supreme Court of New South Wales Equity Division Proceedings Concerning Aboriginal Land, Transfer, Mortgage and Caveats / Judgment After Hearing; Further Argument Reserved on Possession, Judicial Sale, Appropriate Orders and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Council was entitled to relief in respect of the transfer of lot 11 to the Trustee and the mortgage to LKM.' 'Whether the Council authorised the transfer of lot 11 to the Trustee.' 'Whether LKM was entitled to judgment against the Council or orders requiring withdrawal of caveats over lot 11.' "Whether LKM's second cross claim and Paramount's third cross claim should be dismissed."]
Ratio Decidendi
For the reasons given in Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v KLALC Property & Investment Pty Ltd & Anor [2006] NSWSC 856 and, as to authority to transfer lot 11, in Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v CKT Developments Pty Ltd & Anor [2006] NSWSC 862, the Council was not entitled to relief. LKM was not entitled to judgment in any sum against the Council, but was entitled to orders requiring the Council and the Registrar-General to withdraw their caveats over lot 11; the remaining cross claims were to be dismissed except for further argument on possession and judicial sale against the Trustee.
Court Disposition
Council's proceedings to be dismissed; LKM entitled to orders that the Council and Registrar-General withdraw their caveats; cross claims otherwise to be dismissed, with further argument on possession, judicial sale, formal orders and costs.
Orders
- ["The Council's statement of claim should be dismissed." 'LKM is not entitled to judgment in any sum against the Council under its first cross claim.' 'The Council is to withdraw its caveat over lot 11.' 'Further argument will be heard as to whether there should be judgment for possession against the Trustee and an...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment