Breen & Anor v Caronna & Anor [2008] NSWLEC 293
No sufficient grounds were shown for removing the matter to a Judge; the statutory criteria in the Tree Disputes Act must be met before consent orders can be made, and the Commissioners are empowered and obliged to determine whether these criteria are satisfied.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Class 2 Proceedings / Notice of Motion for Removal to Judge and Consent Orders
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion dismissed; matter returned to Commissioners for hearing to resume.
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'practice and Procedure' 'removal of Proceedings' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 2 Proceedings / Notice of Motion for Removal to Judge and Consent Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceedings should be removed to a Judge under s.36(5) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979' 'Whether consent orders can/should be made by the Court in the circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
No sufficient grounds were shown for removing the matter to a Judge; the statutory criteria in the Tree Disputes Act must be met before consent orders can be made, and the Commissioners are empowered and obliged to determine whether these criteria are satisfied.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion dismissed; matter returned to Commissioners for hearing to resume.
Orders
- ['Notice of Motion is dismissed.' 'The matter is returned to the Commissioners and the resumption of the hearing on site is confirmed.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment