Channon & anor v Norton & anor [2015] NSWLEC 1391
On the balance of probabilities, the roots of the Tallowwood have caused damage to the Channons' wall, enabling exercise of the Court's jurisdiction and justifying an order for the tree's removal due to the extent and nature of damage and the tree's structural defects.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application upheld.
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'damage Caused by Tree Roots' 'orders for Tree Removal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tallowwood tree's roots caused damage to the Channons' wall" 'Whether removal of the Tallowwood is necessary' 'Whether the Silky Oak should be removed']
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, the roots of the Tallowwood have caused damage to the Channons' wall, enabling exercise of the Court's jurisdiction and justifying an order for the tree's removal due to the extent and nature of damage and the tree's structural defects.
Court Disposition
Application upheld.
Orders
- ['The application is upheld.' 'Within 60 days of the date of these orders the respondents are to engage and pay for a suitably qualified arborist (minimum AQF level 3), with all appropriate insurances, to remove the Tallowwood to ground level and to grind out all sections of the stump and woody roots within their...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment