Taylor v Guttenberg [2011] NSWLEC 1159
While the possibility existed that dead wood could fall and cause injury, there was insufficient evidence of likely damage or injury from the live branches or the whole tree in the near future. Thus, removal of the tree was refused, but pruning of dead wood was ordered as a proportionate remedy.
- Parties
- Applicants: P & K Taylor; Respondents: M & J Guttenberg
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Tree Dispute Application / Final Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application upheld in part: tree removal refused; pruning of dead wood ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Tree Disputes Between Neighbours, Pruning or Removal of Trees, Injury or Damage Caused by Trees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P & K Taylor
Applicants
M & J Guttenberg
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tree Dispute Application / Final Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tree on the respondents' property is likely to cause damage to property or injury to any person under s 10(2) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
- 2 What, if any, orders should be made to remedy, restrain or prevent damage or injury
Ratio Decidendi
While the possibility existed that dead wood could fall and cause injury, there was insufficient evidence of likely damage or injury from the live branches or the whole tree in the near future. Thus, removal of the tree was refused, but pruning of dead wood was ordered as a proportionate remedy.
Court Disposition
Application upheld in part: tree removal refused; pruning of dead wood ordered.
Orders
- The application to remove the tree is dismissed.
- The respondents are to engage and pay for an AQF level 3 arborist with appropriate insurances to remove all dead wood down to 15mm in diameter from the portions of the tree that overhang the applicants' property to a distance of 2m inside the respondents' property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment