Ziaziaris v Li [2021] NSWLEC 1373
Trees 1–4 on the respondents' property form a hedge that severely obstructs the applicants' water view from their rear deck; this obstruction outweighs the respondents' privacy concerns, so orders are made for annual pruning to specified heights below the deck railing, with procedural safeguards.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part, orders made for pruning of trees 1–4 to specified heights, and procedural directions.
- Legal Topics
- ['trees (disputes Between Neighbours)' 'obstruction of Views' 'obstruction of Sunlight' 'pruning Orders' 'privacy Balancing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether trees form a hedge as required by s 14A(1) of the Trees Act' "Whether the trees severely obstruct sunlight to a window of the applicants' dwelling" "Whether the trees severely obstruct a view from the applicants' dwelling" "Whether the applicants' interest in mitigating the issue outweighs respondents' privacy and amenity concerns"]
Ratio Decidendi
Trees 1–4 on the respondents' property form a hedge that severely obstructs the applicants' water view from their rear deck; this obstruction outweighs the respondents' privacy concerns, so orders are made for annual pruning to specified heights below the deck railing, with procedural safeguards.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part, orders made for pruning of trees 1–4 to specified heights, and procedural directions.
Orders
- ["In July of 2021, respondents to engage suitably experienced horticultural contractor with all appropriate insurances to prune trees T1-T4 so that they are no taller than 500 mm below top railing of applicants' rear deck." "In July of each subsequent year beginning 2022, respondents to engage suitably experienced...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment