Green & Anor v Dyson & Anor [2011] NSWLEC 1057
The evidence established that the tree poses a risk of injury to persons due to the volume of deadwood, epicormic growth, and decay, and that necessary pruning would largely destroy the tree. Therefore, removal rather than pruning is warranted under the Act.
- Parties
- Applicants: W L & R A Green; Respondents: W & W Dyson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application to remove the tree upheld
- Legal Topics
- Trees (disputes Between Neighbours), Risk of Injury to Persons, Tree Removal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
W L & R A Green
Applicants
W & W Dyson
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tree on the respondents' land is likely to cause injury to persons under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
- 2 Whether pruning or removal is the appropriate remedy
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence established that the tree poses a risk of injury to persons due to the volume of deadwood, epicormic growth, and decay, and that necessary pruning would largely destroy the tree. Therefore, removal rather than pruning is warranted under the Act.
Court Disposition
Application to remove the tree upheld
Orders
- The tree is to be removed to a point not more than 600mm from ground as measured from the respondents' land.
- The removal is to be undertaken by an Arborist with at least AQF level 3 qualifications in arboriculture and with appropriate insurances including NSW WorkCover insurance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment