Mc Ilwraith v Jones & anor [2007] NSWLEC 612
Due to increased wind exposure following removal of adjacent trees, included bark creating potential weakness, and proximity to the applicants' house, the tree is likely to cause damage in the near future or injury to a person if failure occurs. It is therefore appropriate to order pruning to reduce this risk.
- Parties
- Applicants: D and R Mc Ilwraith; Respondents: J Jones and E Hodda
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Neighbour Tree Dispute Application / Final Decision (ex Tempore Judgment)
- Outcome
- Orders for pruning of the subject tree granted.
- Legal Topics
- Trees (disputes Between Neighbours), Pruning of Trees, Liability for Tree Damage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D and R Mc Ilwraith
Applicants
J Jones and E Hodda
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Neighbour Tree Dispute Application / Final Decision (ex Tempore Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tree poses a risk of damage to property or injury to persons such that intervention is warranted under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
Ratio Decidendi
Due to increased wind exposure following removal of adjacent trees, included bark creating potential weakness, and proximity to the applicants' house, the tree is likely to cause damage in the near future or injury to a person if failure occurs. It is therefore appropriate to order pruning to reduce this risk.
Court Disposition
Orders for pruning of the subject tree granted.
Orders
- Respondents to arrange for pruning by an experienced arborist (AQF level 3 or higher) and in accordance with Australian Standard 4373 of 2007 - Pruning of Amenity Trees.
- Pruning to consist of removal of the lowest branch from the western trunk (main branch overhanging applicants' house).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment