Brain & anor v Marsden & anor [2015] NSWLEC 1283
There is no severe obstruction of sunlight to a window or a view from the applicants' dwelling caused by the respondents' hedges at present; thus, the jurisdictional tests under s 14E(2) are not met and no orders can be made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Decision on Merits
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006' 'hedges' 'obstruction of Sunlight' 'obstruction of Views' 'neighbour Disputes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Decision on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the hedges severely obstruct sunlight to a window of a dwelling on the applicant's land" "Whether the hedges severely obstruct a view from a dwelling on the applicant's land under s 14E(2) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006"]
Ratio Decidendi
There is no severe obstruction of sunlight to a window or a view from the applicants' dwelling caused by the respondents' hedges at present; thus, the jurisdictional tests under s 14E(2) are not met and no orders can be made.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment