R v Macdonald; R v Maitland (No 3) [2022] NSWSC 1209

R v Macdonald; R v Maitland (No 3) [2022] NSWSC 1209

The adjournment was appropriate because Mr Macdonald's representatives had not been able to obtain proper instructions to any reasonable degree despite their efforts, and additional time with their client was necessary for a fair trial; the short delay might also create efficiency by reducing the number of witnesses required at trial.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 September 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Application for Adjournment
Outcome
Application granted; matter adjourned until 6 September 2022.
Legal Topics
['trial Adjournment' 'accused in Custody' 'access to Accused for Instructions' 'fair Trial']
['criminal Procedure'] ['trial Adjournment' 'accused in Custody' 'access to Accused for Instructions' 'fair Trial']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Trial / Application for Adjournment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the trial should be adjourned until 6 September 2022 to allow Mr Macdonald's representatives additional time to obtain instructions from him."]

Ratio Decidendi

The adjournment was appropriate because Mr Macdonald's representatives had not been able to obtain proper instructions to any reasonable degree despite their efforts, and additional time with their client was necessary for a fair trial; the short delay might also create efficiency by reducing the number of witnesses required at trial.

Court Disposition

Application granted; matter adjourned until 6 September 2022.

Orders

  • ['The trial of the matter is adjourned until 6 September 2022.']