Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 1441
It would not be in the interests of justice to proceed to trial before resolution of the appeal for which leave has been granted regarding interlocutory discovery, and the trial dates should be vacated.
- Parties
- Applicant (sad 49 of 2017), Respondent (nsd 1610 of 2016): Thomas Patrick Martin; Respondent (sad 49 of 2017), Applicant (nsd 1610 of 2016): Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Practice and Procedure, Employment & Industrial Relations / Interlocutory Hearing Regarding Trial Dates Adjournment Pending Potential Appeal
- Outcome
- Trial dates vacated, case adjourned for rescheduling; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Trial Adjournment, Leave to Appeal, Discovery, Legal Professional Privilege
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Patrick Martin
Applicant (sad 49 of 2017), Respondent (nsd 1610 of 2016)
Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
Respondent (sad 49 of 2017), Applicant (nsd 1610 of 2016)
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure, Employment & Industrial Relations / Interlocutory Hearing Regarding Trial Dates Adjournment Pending Potential Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trial dates should be vacated due to pending appeal on interlocutory discovery decision
- 2 Whether it is proper for the trial judge to condition trial listing on applicant filing notice of appeal or extension application
Ratio Decidendi
It would not be in the interests of justice to proceed to trial before resolution of the appeal for which leave has been granted regarding interlocutory discovery, and the trial dates should be vacated.
Court Disposition
Trial dates vacated, case adjourned for rescheduling; costs reserved.
Orders
- The trial dates of 23-27 September 2019 be vacated.
- The parties advise the Court of any unavailability for a five day trial during March 2020 by 4.00 pm on Friday 27 September 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment