R v McKnight [2014] NSWSC 398
Leave to apply out of time was granted because the accused had given notice of the intended application and the Crown consented. The trial by judge order was refused because the interests of justice did not require trial by judge alone: the reasoned judgment argument was not persuasive; the substantial impairment issue, particularly the evaluative question whether impairment was so substantial as to warrant reducing murder to manslaughter, required objective community values and strongly favoured trial by jury; the accused's medical history did not create a justifiable apprehension of prejudice; general publicity about alcohol fuelled violence could be addressed by jury directions and did...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Interlocutory Application; Application for Trial by Judge Alone / Before Trial for Murder; Application Under S 132 a Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (nsw) for Leave to Apply Out of Time and Application Under S 132 for a Trial by Judge Order
- Outcome
- Leave to apply for a trial by judge order granted; application for trial by judge order refused; suppression/non-publication restriction imposed until the return of the jury's verdict, with publication to the parties and their legal representatives excepted.
- Legal Topics
- ['trial by Judge Alone' 'interests of Justice' 'jury Trial' 'substantial Impairment' 'pre Trial Publicity' 'alcohol Related Violence' 'objective Community Standards']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Interlocutory Application; Application for Trial by Judge Alone / Before Trial for Murder; Application Under S 132 a Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (nsw) for Leave to Apply Out of Time and Application Under S 132 for a Trial by Judge Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to the accused under s 132A Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) to make an application for a trial by judge order out of time.' 'Whether, the prosecutor not agreeing, it was in the interests of justice under s 132(4) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) to order trial by judge alone.' 'Whether issues concerning substantial impairment under s 23A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) required the application of objective community standards and favoured trial by jury.' "Whether potential prejudice from media coverage of alcohol related public violence or from the accused's medical history justified a trial by judge alone."]
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to apply out of time was granted because the accused had given notice of the intended application and the Crown consented. The trial by judge order was refused because the interests of justice did not require trial by judge alone: the reasoned judgment argument was not persuasive; the substantial impairment issue, particularly the evaluative question whether impairment was so substantial as to warrant reducing murder to manslaughter, required objective community values and strongly favoured trial by jury; the accused's medical history did not create a justifiable apprehension of prejudice; general publicity about alcohol fuelled violence could be addressed by jury directions and did...
Court Disposition
Leave to apply for a trial by judge order granted; application for trial by judge order refused; suppression/non-publication restriction imposed until the return of the jury's verdict, with publication to the parties and their legal representatives excepted.
Orders
- ['Grant leave to the accused to make application for a trial by judge order.' 'Application for trial by judge order refused.' 'Direct the accused to file and serve on the Crown a notice in accordance with the provisions of s151 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 within 14 days of the date hereof.' 'Direct that the Director...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment