R v Adams (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1359
The likely prejudicial effect of the Crown’s tendency evidence against the accused creates a virtual certainty that a jury would find it extremely difficult to dispassionately and objectively analyse the evidence, making it in the interests of justice for the trial to proceed by judge alone under s 132 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), overriding the competing considerations of trial efficiency, financial concerns, and jury capacity to comprehend expert evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application for Trial by Judge Alone
- Outcome
- Application granted: accused to be tried by judge alone.
- Legal Topics
- ['trial by Judge Alone' 'tendency Evidence' 'jury Prejudice' 'judge Alone Trial Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application for Trial by Judge Alone
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the accused should be tried by judge alone under s 132 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW)' 'Whether the interests of justice require a judge alone trial given the nature of the evidence and potential for jury prejudice']
Ratio Decidendi
The likely prejudicial effect of the Crown’s tendency evidence against the accused creates a virtual certainty that a jury would find it extremely difficult to dispassionately and objectively analyse the evidence, making it in the interests of justice for the trial to proceed by judge alone under s 132 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), overriding the competing considerations of trial efficiency, financial concerns, and jury capacity to comprehend expert evidence.
Court Disposition
Application granted: accused to be tried by judge alone.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 132 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), the accused is to be tried by judge alone.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment