R v Mohammad Al-SAYAHEEN [2009] NSWDC 222
Although the accused voluntarily absconded and thereby waived his right to be present, the interests of justice required the trial to be stopped and the jury discharged because the trial had only been running for one day and, since the defence opening was not evidence and would have to be disregarded, the accused's actual case would not be before the jury.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Trial; Decision Whether to Continue After the Accused Voluntarily Absconded While on Bail
- Outcome
- Trial stopped and jury discharged.
- Legal Topics
- ['trial in Absence of Accused' 'absconding While on Bail' 'waiver of Right to Be Present' 'discharge of Jury']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial; Decision Whether to Continue After the Accused Voluntarily Absconded While on Bail
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the accused, by voluntarily absconding during trial, waived his right to be present at trial.' 'Whether the trial should continue in the absence of the accused or whether the jury should be discharged.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the accused voluntarily absconded and thereby waived his right to be present, the interests of justice required the trial to be stopped and the jury discharged because the trial had only been running for one day and, since the defence opening was not evidence and would have to be disregarded, the accused's actual case would not be before the jury.
Court Disposition
Trial stopped and jury discharged.
Orders
- ['Stop the trial and discharge the jury.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment