Buttar v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 860

Buttar v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 860

The appellants' application to the Tribunal was lodged two days outside the prescribed 21 day period, the Tribunal had no power to extend time and therefore had no jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision. The Federal Circuit Court correctly found no jurisdictional error. The appeal grounds concerning an adjournment and interpreter assistance were unsupported by evidence and, in any event, could not affect the outcome because no adjournment or further submissions could confer jurisdiction on the Tribunal or the Federal Circuit Court.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 July 2022
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['tribunal Jurisdiction' 'out of Time Application for Review' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'interpreter Assistance' 'adjournment']
['migration' 'administrative Law'] ['tribunal Jurisdiction' 'out of Time Application for Review' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'interpreter Assistance' 'adjournment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal From Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred by not allowing the appellant more time to seek legal representation or adjourning the matter.' 'Whether the Federal Circuit Court denied the appellant an opportunity to speak and listen through a Punjabi interpreter.' "Whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal had jurisdiction to review the delegate's visa refusal decision when the application for review was lodged outside the prescribed period."]

Ratio Decidendi

The appellants' application to the Tribunal was lodged two days outside the prescribed 21 day period, the Tribunal had no power to extend time and therefore had no jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision. The Federal Circuit Court correctly found no jurisdictional error. The appeal grounds concerning an adjournment and interpreter assistance were unsupported by evidence and, in any event, could not affect the outcome because no adjournment or further submissions could confer jurisdiction on the Tribunal or the Federal Circuit Court.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellants are to pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal."]