Hancock v Rinehart (Trust documents) [2018] NSWSC 1684
The term 'documents of the Trust' for the purposes of delivery up by an outgoing trustee encompasses all documents received or held in the trustee's capacity (even if also held in another capacity) and used in the administration of the Trust, including documents of deliberation, communications with beneficiaries regarding administration, documents jointly held with other entities, electronic records, and legal/accounting advice pertaining to trust administration. Documents may only be withheld if they fall outside this scope or are privileged in the trustee's personal capacity (e.g., solely for defending actual or contemplated beneficiary claims). Where a trustee has misconceived the...
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: John Langley Hancock; Second Plaintiff: Bianca Hope Rinehart; First Defendant: Gina Hope Rinehart; Second Defendant: Ginia Hope Frances Rinehart; Third Defendant: Hope Rinehart Welker; Fourth Defendant: Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd; Fifth Defendant: Hope Downs Iron Ore Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Trusts and Trustees / Post Judgment Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Orders made as specified in the judgment; first defendant required to verify compliance with the delivery up order and pay plaintiffs' costs.
- Legal Topics
- Trust Documents, Delivery Up Orders, Legal Professional Privilege, Successor Trustee Obligations, Confidentiality, Verification of Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Langley Hancock
First Plaintiff
Bianca Hope Rinehart
Second Plaintiff
Gina Hope Rinehart
First Defendant
Ginia Hope Frances Rinehart
Second Defendant
Hope Rinehart Welker
Third Defendant
Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd
Fourth Defendant
Hope Downs Iron Ore Pty Ltd
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Trusts and Trustees / Post Judgment Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 What constitutes 'documents of the trust' liable to be delivered up by an outgoing trustee to a new trustee?
- 2 Whether the obligation covers trustee deliberations, communications with beneficiaries, or privileged/confidential documents?
- 3 Whether the outgoing trustee complied with the May 2015 delivery up order?
Ratio Decidendi
The term 'documents of the Trust' for the purposes of delivery up by an outgoing trustee encompasses all documents received or held in the trustee's capacity (even if also held in another capacity) and used in the administration of the Trust, including documents of deliberation, communications with beneficiaries regarding administration, documents jointly held with other entities, electronic records, and legal/accounting advice pertaining to trust administration. Documents may only be withheld if they fall outside this scope or are privileged in the trustee's personal capacity (e.g., solely for defending actual or contemplated beneficiary claims). Where a trustee has misconceived the...
Court Disposition
Orders made as specified in the judgment; first defendant required to verify compliance with the delivery up order and pay plaintiffs' costs.
Orders
- By 5 December 2018, the first defendant is to file and serve an affidavit verifying, with all reasonable inquiries and searches, the delivery up or provision to the second plaintiff of all documents of the Trust in her possession, custody, or power, including those clarified in this judgment, and stating any...
- The first defendant to procure that any third party likely to possess documents of the Trust deliver up such documents to the second plaintiff, provide direction and copies of responses to same by 5 December 2018.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment