Beames (Bankrupt) v Aburn (Trustee in Bankruptcy) [2003] FCA 134
Because the respondent was not the trustee in bankruptcy and a s 178 claim was available only against such a trustee, the proceedings as constituted could not succeed against him and the application was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application Seeking Equitable Relief And/or Damages Against an Alleged Trustee in Bankruptcy Pursuant to S 178 of the Bankruptcy Act 1996 (cth) / Dismissed at an Early Stage
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- ['trustee in Bankruptcy' 'section 178 Claim' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Seeking Equitable Relief And/or Damages Against an Alleged Trustee in Bankruptcy Pursuant to S 178 of the Bankruptcy Act 1996 (cth) / Dismissed at an Early Stage
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proceedings under s 178 of the Bankruptcy Act 1996 (Cth) could succeed against the respondent when he was not the trustee in bankruptcy.' 'Whether costs should be ordered on an indemnity basis.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the respondent was not the trustee in bankruptcy and a s 178 claim was available only against such a trustee, the proceedings as constituted could not succeed against him and the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs of these proceedings."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment