Free Serbian Orthodox Church Diocese for Australia and New Zealand Property Trust v Bishop Irinej Dobrijevic (No 3) [2017] NSWCA 109
The Property Trust Company was not entitled to indemnification from trust property for its appeal costs as its conduct was unreasonable, particularly in not seeking judicial advice before appeal and mishandling procedural matters. Individual appellants must pay respondents' costs up to 12 April 2016 due to not withdrawing as parties after abandoning particular grounds. Indemnity costs are ordered against the Property Trust Company for costs relating to written submissions and the application to amend the notice of appeal, due to conduct that made the appeal process unnecessarily burdensome.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Free Serbian Orthodox Church Diocese for Australia and New Zealand Property Trust; Second Appellant: Branko Rupar; Third Appellant: Ratomir Nesic; Fourth Appellant: Ilija Cubrilo; Fifth Appellant: Petar Mandic; First Respondent: Bishop Irinej Dobrijevic; Second Respondent: Serbian Orthodox Church in Australia and New Zealand Properties Ltd; Third Respondent: Attorney General for the State of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Orders for costs and indemnification: appeal dismissed, and specific costs orders made against appellants.
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Indemnification, Costs, Charitable Trust Management, Appeal Procedure, Indemnity Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Free Serbian Orthodox Church Diocese for Australia and New Zealand Property Trust
First Appellant
Branko Rupar
Second Appellant
Ratomir Nesic
Third Appellant
Ilija Cubrilo
Fourth Appellant
Petar Mandic
Fifth Appellant
Bishop Irinej Dobrijevic
First Respondent
Serbian Orthodox Church in Australia and New Zealand Properties Ltd
Second Respondent
Attorney General for the State of New South Wales
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the Property Trust Company be indemnified from the trust property for its own costs or any costs it is ordered to pay?
- 2 Should the individual appellants pay the first and second respondents' costs of the appeal?
- 3 On what basis should any costs order be made, including indemnity costs?
Ratio Decidendi
The Property Trust Company was not entitled to indemnification from trust property for its appeal costs as its conduct was unreasonable, particularly in not seeking judicial advice before appeal and mishandling procedural matters. Individual appellants must pay respondents' costs up to 12 April 2016 due to not withdrawing as parties after abandoning particular grounds. Indemnity costs are ordered against the Property Trust Company for costs relating to written submissions and the application to amend the notice of appeal, due to conduct that made the appeal process unnecessarily burdensome.
Court Disposition
Orders for costs and indemnification: appeal dismissed, and specific costs orders made against appellants.
Orders
- Property Trust Company not entitled to have any costs of appeal paid from trust property; no indemnification from trust fund for appeal costs or costs ordered to pay respondents.
- Individual appellants pay first and second respondents' costs of appeal up to and including 12 April 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment