Lahood v Ernst & Young; In the Matter of Dave Lahood Pty Ltd (In Liq) [2015] FCA 89
Mr Lahood did not demonstrate a proper case or provide sufficient evidence to justify an inquiry into the trustee's or liquidators' conduct under s 179 of the Bankruptcy Act or s 536 of the Corporations Act; the applications were therefore dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Applications for Inquiry Into Trustee and Liquidator Conduct / Judgment After Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['trustee Inquiry Under Bankruptcy Act S 179' 'liquidator Inquiry Under Corporations Act S 536']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Applications for Inquiry Into Trustee and Liquidator Conduct / Judgment After Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a proper case for inquiry into the conduct of the trustee in bankruptcy has been demonstrated under s 179 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)' 'Whether a sufficient basis exists for an inquiry into the conduct of the liquidators under s 536 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Lahood did not demonstrate a proper case or provide sufficient evidence to justify an inquiry into the trustee's or liquidators' conduct under s 179 of the Bankruptcy Act or s 536 of the Corporations Act; the applications were therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed
Orders
- ["In NSD 999 of 2014: First, third and fifth defendants removed as parties; application dismissed; defendants' costs to be costs in the winding up of Dave Lahood Pty Ltd (In Liquidation)." "In NSD 1211 of 2014: First, third and fourth respondents removed as parties; application dismissed; respondents' costs to be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment