Westfield QLD No. 1 Pty Limited & Anor v Lend Lease Real Estate Investments Limited & Ors [2008] NSWSC 516
The court declined to order the winding up of the trusts or appointment of receivers because the powers under Part 54 r 3 UCPR, inherent jurisdiction, and s 81 of the Trustee Act do not authorize the court to terminate a trust outside the circumstances provided for in the trust instrument; and because there was no established deadlock or detriment to beneficiaries, with alternative mechanisms available for resolution.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Westfield QLD No. 1 Pty Limited; Second Plaintiff: Westfield QLD No. 2 Pty Limited; First Defendant: Lend Lease Real Estate Investments Limited; Second Defendant: Cairns Central Limited; Third Defendant: Perpetual Limited; Fourth Defendant: Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings / Judgment on Contested Application for Orders; Final Decision
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trusts and Trustees, Powers of Trustee, Administration of Trusts, Receivers, Court's Inherent Jurisdiction, Termination and Winding Up of Trusts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Westfield QLD No. 1 Pty Limited
First Plaintiff
Westfield QLD No. 2 Pty Limited
Second Plaintiff
Lend Lease Real Estate Investments Limited
First Defendant
Cairns Central Limited
Second Defendant
Perpetual Limited
Third Defendant
Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings / Judgment on Contested Application for Orders; Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction under Part 54 rule 3 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), section 67 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), its inherent jurisdiction, section 81 of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW), or section 63 of the Trustee Act 1958 (Vic) to order the winding up of the trusts holding the Cairns Central Shopping Centre;
- 2 Whether circumstances existed justifying the intervention of the court in the management or winding up of the trusts;
- 3 Whether the suggested deadlock in management justified the orders sought;
Ratio Decidendi
The court declined to order the winding up of the trusts or appointment of receivers because the powers under Part 54 r 3 UCPR, inherent jurisdiction, and s 81 of the Trustee Act do not authorize the court to terminate a trust outside the circumstances provided for in the trust instrument; and because there was no established deadlock or detriment to beneficiaries, with alternative mechanisms available for resolution.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed
Orders
- Proceedings to be dismissed. Short minutes of order to be brought in; costs may be ordered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment