Bristow v Bristow [2014] NSWSC 1636

Bristow v Bristow [2014] NSWSC 1636

Leave to file the cross-claim was refused because the joinder of the proposed cross-defendants was not necessary; the issue of testamentary capacity should properly be determined, if at all, in a future probate suit, not pre-empted in these proceedings. Forcing parties to litigate the question now would not avoid future litigation and would serve mainly to bind persons who do not presently wish to be parties.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 November 2014
Procedural Posture
Equity Division / Application for Leave to File Cross Claim
Outcome
Leave to file cross-claim refused. Paragraph 2 of the notice of motion dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['trusts and Trustees—constitution of Trust' 'testamentary Capacity' 'cross Claims—joinder of Parties' 'declaratory Relief']
['equity' 'civil Procedure'] ['trusts and Trustees—constitution of Trust' 'testamentary Capacity' 'cross Claims—joinder of Parties' 'declaratory Relief']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Division / Application for Leave to File Cross Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the court should grant leave to file a cross-claim to join additional parties for declarations concerning the plaintiff's testamentary capacity as of 6 August 2004" 'Whether such declaratory relief ought to be granted prior to the death of the testator']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to file the cross-claim was refused because the joinder of the proposed cross-defendants was not necessary; the issue of testamentary capacity should properly be determined, if at all, in a future probate suit, not pre-empted in these proceedings. Forcing parties to litigate the question now would not avoid future litigation and would serve mainly to bind persons who do not presently wish to be parties.

Court Disposition

Leave to file cross-claim refused. Paragraph 2 of the notice of motion dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Leave to file cross-claim refused.' 'Paragraph 2 of the notice of motion filed 2 October 2014 dismissed with costs.']