Queensland North Australia Pty Ltd v Takeovers Panel [2014] FCA 591
It was open to the Takeovers Panel to find and declare unacceptable circumstances were ongoing where applicants continued to hold shares acquired in contravention of s 606, thus application was not barred by time limits; voting power is calculated on all shares to which legal rights attach, regardless of contractual voting restraints; the Panel's findings and orders were within power and adequately reasoned, and no apprehended bias or denial of natural justice was established. Accordingly, the application for judicial review was dismissed and the applicants were ordered to pay respondents' costs.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Queensland North Australia Pty Ltd; Second Applicant: Closeridge Pty Ltd; Third Applicant: Clive Frederick Palmer; First Respondent: Takeovers Panel; Second Respondent: The President's Club Limited; Third Respondent: President, Takeovers Panel; Fourth Respondent: Australian Securities and Investments Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unacceptable Circumstances (takeovers), Takeover Bid Procedure, Judicial Review – Natural Justice, Statutory Interpretation – Voting Power, Panel Procedural Fairness, Bias – Apprehended Bias, Wednesbury Unreasonableness, Stapled Securities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Queensland North Australia Pty Ltd
First Applicant
Closeridge Pty Ltd
Second Applicant
Clive Frederick Palmer
Third Applicant
Takeovers Panel
First Respondent
The President's Club Limited
Second Respondent
President, Takeovers Panel
Third Respondent
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Panel denied natural justice in extending time for application without notice
- 2 Whether the Panel erred in finding that circumstances were ongoing for purposes of s 657A and s 657C of the Corporations Act
- 3 Whether acquisition of voting power breached s 606 despite deed poll limiting voting rights
Ratio Decidendi
It was open to the Takeovers Panel to find and declare unacceptable circumstances were ongoing where applicants continued to hold shares acquired in contravention of s 606, thus application was not barred by time limits; voting power is calculated on all shares to which legal rights attach, regardless of contractual voting restraints; the Panel's findings and orders were within power and adequately reasoned, and no apprehended bias or denial of natural justice was established. Accordingly, the application for judicial review was dismissed and the applicants were ordered to pay respondents' costs.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
- The costs of the first, second, third and fourth respondents of and incidental to this proceeding are to be paid by the applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment