Francis v CPI Graphics Ltd [2011] NSWSC 317
The plaintiffs have established under the proper construction of the undertaking that there is a significant risk that CPI Graphics Limited may, if required by judgment, be unable to refund the mortgage proceeds with interest. Therefore, under its undertaking, CPI Graphics Limited is obliged to pay the sum (with interest) into Court.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Catherine Margaret Francis; Second Plaintiff: Robert Michael Francis; First Defendant: CPI Graphics Limited; Second Defendant: Eric Baillie Francis
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Motion on Undertaking Prior to Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' motion granted in part.
- Legal Topics
- Undertakings to Court, Interlocutory Orders, Costs of Interlocutory Applications, Significant Risk Under Undertakings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Catherine Margaret Francis
First Plaintiff
Robert Michael Francis
Second Plaintiff
CPI Graphics Limited
First Defendant
Eric Baillie Francis
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Motion on Undertaking Prior to Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs have established a significant risk that the first defendant may be unable to refund the mortgage proceeds with interest if required by judgment
- 2 Proper construction of the undertaking given to the court
- 3 Whether a special costs order should be made for interlocutory costs to be payable forthwith
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs have established under the proper construction of the undertaking that there is a significant risk that CPI Graphics Limited may, if required by judgment, be unable to refund the mortgage proceeds with interest. Therefore, under its undertaking, CPI Graphics Limited is obliged to pay the sum (with interest) into Court.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' motion granted in part.
Orders
- Order that the first defendant by 15 April 2011 pay into Court to the credit of these proceedings the sum of $2,062,353.40 (which includes interest to 15 April)
- Order that the first defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment