Regan & Anor v Redeemer Baptist School Limited & Anor [2006] NSWIRComm 58
The Court was not satisfied that the summons was merely speculative, irrelevant or an exercise in fishing. The documents sought were relevant to the applicants' allegations, to their motion to join persons said to operate Redeemer Baptist Church, and to possible cross-examination about the pleaded employment arrangements. The second respondent had used the business name Redeemer Baptist Church until January 2006 and the requested information had been exclusive to it until then. It was unnecessary at this stage to determine jurisdictional issues or finally determine whether the second respondent traded as Redeemer Baptist Church. The second respondent's motion to set aside the summons was...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996; Unfair Contract Proceedings / Notice of Motion by the Second Respondent to Set Aside Parts of a Summons for Production
- Outcome
- Second respondent's motion dismissed; second respondent to bear the applicants' costs of the motion as agreed or assessed.
- Legal Topics
- ['unfair Contract' 'summons for Production' 'fishing Expedition' 'unincorporated Association' 'joinder' 'relevance of Documents']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996; Unfair Contract Proceedings / Notice of Motion by the Second Respondent to Set Aside Parts of a Summons for Production
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether parts of the summons for production issued to the second respondent should be set aside.' 'Whether the production sought was merely speculative, irrelevant, too wide or an impermissible fishing expedition.' 'Whether the summons was improperly directed to Redeemer Baptist Church rather than the second respondent.' "Whether documents concerning the relationship between the unincorporated association and the corporate proprietor were relevant to the applicants' joinder motion and substantive unfair contract proceedings."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was not satisfied that the summons was merely speculative, irrelevant or an exercise in fishing. The documents sought were relevant to the applicants' allegations, to their motion to join persons said to operate Redeemer Baptist Church, and to possible cross-examination about the pleaded employment arrangements. The second respondent had used the business name Redeemer Baptist Church until January 2006 and the requested information had been exclusive to it until then. It was unnecessary at this stage to determine jurisdictional issues or finally determine whether the second respondent traded as Redeemer Baptist Church. The second respondent's motion to set aside the summons was...
Court Disposition
Second respondent's motion dismissed; second respondent to bear the applicants' costs of the motion as agreed or assessed.
Orders
- ["The second respondent's motion is dismissed." "The second respondent is to bear the applicants' costs of the motion, as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment