Logan & Ors v WorldAudio Ltd & Ors [2003] NSWIRComm 87
It would be inappropriate to grant interlocutory relief amounting to specific performance of a consultancy agreement involving personal services where there is evidence of personal acrimony and disputed obligations between the parties; such orders are rarely made except in exceptional cases and damages are likely an adequate remedy.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Graeme Logan; Second Applicant: Logan Corporation Pty Ltd; Third Applicant: Perabo Investment Corporation Pty Ltd; First Respondent: WorldAudio Limited; Second Respondent: Andrew Peter Thompson; Third Respondent: Link Traders (Aust) Pty Ltd; Fourth Respondent: Everest Capital Limited; Fifth Respondent: Grosvenor Pirie Management Ltd; Sixth Respondent: Zycare Trading Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Interlocutory orders restraining termination of the consultancy agreement refused; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Contract, Specific Performance, Injunction, Consultancy Agreement, Personal Services Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Graeme Logan
First Applicant
Logan Corporation Pty Ltd
Second Applicant
Perabo Investment Corporation Pty Ltd
Third Applicant
WorldAudio Limited
First Respondent
Andrew Peter Thompson
Second Respondent
Link Traders (Aust) Pty Ltd
Third Respondent
Everest Capital Limited
Fourth Respondent
Grosvenor Pirie Management Ltd
Fifth Respondent
Zycare Trading Ltd
Sixth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interlocutory orders restraining the termination of a consultancy agreement should be granted
- 2 Whether specific performance of a contract for personal services can be ordered in these circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
It would be inappropriate to grant interlocutory relief amounting to specific performance of a consultancy agreement involving personal services where there is evidence of personal acrimony and disputed obligations between the parties; such orders are rarely made except in exceptional cases and damages are likely an adequate remedy.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory orders restraining termination of the consultancy agreement refused; costs reserved.
Orders
- That part of the notice of motion directed to orders Nos 1 and 2 is dismissed.
- Costs are reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment