Hosking v Extend N Build Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 107
Judgment should be entered for Evolvebuilt Contracting Pty Ltd (in liq), as third appellant, against Kennico Interiors Pty Ltd, sixth respondent, in the sum of $91,978 for unfair preference payments pursuant to s 588FF(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), with the payment to be made to the company in liquidation, consistent with conventional orders, and procedural requirements relating to court constitution satisfied by reconstituting bench.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Hosking, in his capacity as joint and several liquidator of Evolvebuilt Contracting Pty Ltd (in liq); Second Appellant: Hurst, in his capacity as joint and several liquidator of Evolvebuilt Contracting Pty Ltd (in liq); Third Appellant: Evolvebuilt Contracting Pty Ltd (in liq); First Respondent: Extend N Build Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Build Projects Pty Ltd; Third Respondent: Consek Pty Ltd; Fourth Respondent: Thehai Trinh; Fifth Respondent: Truthful Constructions Pty Ltd; Sixth Respondent: Kennico Interiors Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Consequential Orders Following Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the third appellant against the sixth respondent in the amount of $91,978.00.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Preference Payments, Consequential Orders, Court Constitution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hosking, in his capacity as joint and several liquidator of Evolvebuilt Contracting Pty Ltd (in liq)
First Appellant
Hurst, in his capacity as joint and several liquidator of Evolvebuilt Contracting Pty Ltd (in liq)
Second Appellant
Evolvebuilt Contracting Pty Ltd (in liq)
Third Appellant
Extend N Build Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Build Projects Pty Ltd
Second Respondent
Consek Pty Ltd
Third Respondent
Thehai Trinh
Fourth Respondent
Truthful Constructions Pty Ltd
Fifth Respondent
Kennico Interiors Pty Ltd
Sixth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Consequential Orders Following Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate form of consequential order relating to unfair preference payments under s 588FF(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 2 Proper party to receive payment pursuant to s 588FF(1)(a)
- 3 Procedure for reconstituting Court when original bench member no longer available
Ratio Decidendi
Judgment should be entered for Evolvebuilt Contracting Pty Ltd (in liq), as third appellant, against Kennico Interiors Pty Ltd, sixth respondent, in the sum of $91,978 for unfair preference payments pursuant to s 588FF(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), with the payment to be made to the company in liquidation, consistent with conventional orders, and procedural requirements relating to court constitution satisfied by reconstituting bench.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the third appellant against the sixth respondent in the amount of $91,978.00.
Orders
- Judgment for the third appellant against the sixth respondent in the amount of $91,978.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment