R v Hemraj [2002] NSWSC 149
On the whole of the evidence, including psychiatric reports and facts surrounding the offence, the accused was found to be suffering from paranoid schizophrenia at the time of the killing and, while he knew the nature and quality of his act, he did not know that what he was doing was wrong due to mental illness within the meaning of the McNaghten Rules. Accordingly, the special verdict is made out.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Sunil Dhiraj Hemraj
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Special Hearing Following Finding of Unfitness to Be Tried
- Outcome
- Not guilty on the ground of mental illness.
- Legal Topics
- Unfitness to Stand Trial, Special Hearing, Murder, Defence of Mental Illness, Mc Naghten Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Sunil Dhiraj Hemraj
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Special Hearing Following Finding of Unfitness to Be Tried
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is entitled to a special verdict of not guilty by reason of mental illness under the Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act 1990
Ratio Decidendi
On the whole of the evidence, including psychiatric reports and facts surrounding the offence, the accused was found to be suffering from paranoid schizophrenia at the time of the killing and, while he knew the nature and quality of his act, he did not know that what he was doing was wrong due to mental illness within the meaning of the McNaghten Rules. Accordingly, the special verdict is made out.
Court Disposition
Not guilty on the ground of mental illness.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment