Broughton v Leslie [2019] NSWSC 827
Noondoo and Yurone are entitled to their respective annual Stock and Domestic Water amounts as calculated in the Geolyse spreadsheet, by virtue of clause 73 of the 2012 deed and their membership as properties, in addition to Wewona and Jamea's WAL13360 entitlements; there is no implied unilateral right to resign from the unincorporated association for properties treated as members under the deed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Decision Following Hearing
- Outcome
- Declaratory relief in favour of plaintiffs for separate Stock and Domestic Water entitlements for Noondoo and Yurone; balance of claim to be dismissed; cross-claim dismissed as moot; costs to be heard.
- Legal Topics
- ['unincorporated Associations' 'contractual Construction' 'water Rights' 'resignation From Association']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Decision Following Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Are Noondoo and Yurone entitled to separate Stock and Domestic Water under the TNSDS deed?' 'Is there an implied contractual right to resign from the unincorporated association in respect of Noondoo and Yurone?']
Ratio Decidendi
Noondoo and Yurone are entitled to their respective annual Stock and Domestic Water amounts as calculated in the Geolyse spreadsheet, by virtue of clause 73 of the 2012 deed and their membership as properties, in addition to Wewona and Jamea's WAL13360 entitlements; there is no implied unilateral right to resign from the unincorporated association for properties treated as members under the deed.
Court Disposition
Declaratory relief in favour of plaintiffs for separate Stock and Domestic Water entitlements for Noondoo and Yurone; balance of claim to be dismissed; cross-claim dismissed as moot; costs to be heard.
Orders
- ['Direct the parties to supply to my Associate within 21 days agreed short minutes of order, or in default of agreement, direct the plaintiffs to supply a short minute of the orders for which they contend, and short submissions in support of those orders, within 21 days, with the defendants to supply the orders for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment