Menon v O'Connor [2021] FCA 598
Given the returning officer's finding that Mr Menon's nomination in the union election is valid, urgency and necessity for immediate judicial relief are removed. Section 164B of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act restricts the Court from making orders invalidating an election, and any challenge is properly brought by way of inquiry under s 200 after the ballot declaration. Accordingly, the proceeding should be adjourned to a date not earlier than the declaration of the ballot.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Relief and Cross Claim / Interlocutory Hearing; Adjournment Decision
- Outcome
- Proceedings adjourned to a date to be fixed, not earlier than the declaration of the ballot in respect of the election; leave to CFMMEU to intervene on adjournment question granted; liberty to apply granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['union Membership' 'election Disputes' 'judicial Review Under Fair Work (registered Organisations) Act' 'standing to Contest Union Elections']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Relief and Cross Claim / Interlocutory Hearing; Adjournment Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant was unlawfully removed from the Union membership register' 'Whether the applicant is eligible to stand in the present union election' 'Whether the Federal Court should proceed to exercise judicial relief where the returning officer has determined nomination valid' 'Interaction of s 164B and s 200 of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act with present relief']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the returning officer's finding that Mr Menon's nomination in the union election is valid, urgency and necessity for immediate judicial relief are removed. Section 164B of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act restricts the Court from making orders invalidating an election, and any challenge is properly brought by way of inquiry under s 200 after the ballot declaration. Accordingly, the proceeding should be adjourned to a date not earlier than the declaration of the ballot.
Court Disposition
Proceedings adjourned to a date to be fixed, not earlier than the declaration of the ballot in respect of the election; leave to CFMMEU to intervene on adjournment question granted; liberty to apply granted.
Orders
- ['Leave granted to the CFMMEU to intervene on the question of adjournment, with wider intervention reserved.' 'Proceeding adjourned to a date to be fixed, not earlier than declaration of the ballot in the Manufacturing Division election.' 'Liberty to apply.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment