Purden Pty Ltd v Registrar in Bankruptcy for the Bankruptcy District of the Sate of New South Wales & Australian Capital Territory [1982] FCA 132
The appeal was allowed as the rules under which the appellants were dismissed and expelled were not validly made in accordance with the provisions of the union’s rules and s.140 of the Act. Amendments conferring broad rule-making powers on the Federal Council, which bypassed member participation, were found unreasonable and thus invalid. Further, even were the subsequent validation provisions of the Act relevant, they did not retrospectively validate the penalties imposed. The Court found that while the appellants’ conduct was serious, they remained members, as proper procedures for expulsion under valid rules were not followed. The Court’s discretion under s.141 was ultimately exercised...
- Parties
- Appellants: Robert Arthur Cook, Ulick Colin Bignell, Harold Shooter, Kenneth Lewis Tyler, Royce Lawrence Cummins, Gregory Lawrence Waters; Respondents: G. Crawford, G.L. Smith, R. Fairweather, R. Hevey, T. Bourke, R. Masterson and The Plumbers and Gasfitters Employees' Union of Australia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Full Court Appeal From a Judgment of a Single Judge Regarding Applications Under S.141 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904
- Outcome
- Application stood over for further consideration; formal orders not made at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- Union Rules and Governance, Expulsion and Dismissal From Membership or Office, Amendment and Validity of Union Rules, Judicial Discretion Under S.141, Interpretation and Application of Arbitration Legislation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Arthur Cook, Ulick Colin Bignell, Harold Shooter, Kenneth Lewis Tyler, Royce Lawrence Cummins, Gregory Lawrence Waters
Appellants
G. Crawford, G.L. Smith, R. Fairweather, R. Hevey, T. Bourke, R. Masterson and The Plumbers and Gasfitters Employees' Union of Australia
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Full Court Appeal From a Judgment of a Single Judge Regarding Applications Under S.141 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Executive had power to dismiss and expel the appellants under the rules of the union
- 2 Whether amendments to the union’s rules conferring powers on the Federal Executive were valid
- 3 Whether the union’s rule-making powers or Federal Council composition contravened s.140 of the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed as the rules under which the appellants were dismissed and expelled were not validly made in accordance with the provisions of the union’s rules and s.140 of the Act. Amendments conferring broad rule-making powers on the Federal Council, which bypassed member participation, were found unreasonable and thus invalid. Further, even were the subsequent validation provisions of the Act relevant, they did not retrospectively validate the penalties imposed. The Court found that while the appellants’ conduct was serious, they remained members, as proper procedures for expulsion under valid rules were not followed. The Court’s discretion under s.141 was ultimately exercised...
Court Disposition
Application stood over for further consideration; formal orders not made at this stage.
Orders
- The matters be stood over for further consideration to a date to be fixed by the Court of its own motion or upon application by either party.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment