STUDER v BOETTCHER [1993] NSWCA 258
There was no error in the orders made by Waddell CJ in Eq and Young J striking out the claims, as the amended pleadings disclosed no sufficient cause of action, and hence no ground for leave to appeal was made out.
- Parties
- Claimant: URJ Studer; 1st Opponent: Boettcher; 2nd Opponent: Ms Konig
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Summons for Leave to Appeal and Motion for Extension of Time/protection of Property / Appellate (leave to Appeal From Orders of Equity Division, Supreme Court of Nsw)
- Outcome
- Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs; motion dismissed as unnecessary to determine.
- Legal Topics
- Unjust Contracts, Pleading, Leave to Appeal, Self Represented Litigants, Contracts Review Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
URJ Studer
Claimant
Boettcher
1st Opponent
Ms Konig
2nd Opponent
Procedural Posture
Summons for Leave to Appeal and Motion for Extension of Time/protection of Property / Appellate (leave to Appeal From Orders of Equity Division, Supreme Court of Nsw)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the amended pleadings disclosed a cause of action sufficient to defeat a strike out under the Contracts Review Act 1980
- 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted from orders striking out claims
- 3 Procedural fairness for self-represented litigant
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error in the orders made by Waddell CJ in Eq and Young J striking out the claims, as the amended pleadings disclosed no sufficient cause of action, and hence no ground for leave to appeal was made out.
Court Disposition
Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs; motion dismissed as unnecessary to determine.
Orders
- Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
- Motion dismissed as unnecessary to determine
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment