Mizzi Family Holdings Pty Ltd v Morellini (No 4) [2017] FCA 1021

Mizzi Family Holdings Pty Ltd v Morellini (No 4) [2017] FCA 1021

The cross-claim for damages for allegedly unjustified threats had been dismissed because the cross-claimant failed to establish any loss attributable to the threats, and that problem should have been identified by the cross-claimant or his legal advisers; in those circumstances, the cross-claimant was ordered to pay the first and second cross-respondents' costs of and incidental to that issue.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Patent Proceeding Involving a Cross Claim for Damages for Allegedly Unjustified Threats / Costs Orders After Dismissal of the Unjustified Threats Issue
Outcome
The cross-claimant was ordered to pay the first and second cross-respondents' costs of and incidental to the issue of unjustified threats.
Legal Topics
['unjustified Threats' 'damages' 'loss Attributable to Threats' 'costs of an Issue']
['patents' 'intellectual Property' 'costs'] ['unjustified Threats' 'damages' 'loss Attributable to Threats' 'costs of an Issue']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Patent Proceeding Involving a Cross Claim for Damages for Allegedly Unjustified Threats / Costs Orders After Dismissal of the Unjustified Threats Issue

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the cross-claimant should pay the first and second cross-respondents' costs of and incidental to the issue of unjustified threats after failing to establish any loss attributable to the alleged threats."]

Ratio Decidendi

The cross-claim for damages for allegedly unjustified threats had been dismissed because the cross-claimant failed to establish any loss attributable to the threats, and that problem should have been identified by the cross-claimant or his legal advisers; in those circumstances, the cross-claimant was ordered to pay the first and second cross-respondents' costs of and incidental to that issue.

Court Disposition

The cross-claimant was ordered to pay the first and second cross-respondents' costs of and incidental to the issue of unjustified threats.

Orders

  • ["The cross-claimant pay the first and second cross-respondents' costs of and incidental to the issue of unjustified threats."]