R v Mercuri De Figueiredo [2021] NSWDC 424
The accused intentionally placed MDMA in the complainant's drink with intent to enable himself to commit an indictable offence, namely assault, thereby lowering her resistance and facilitating sexual acts, and subsequent acts of sexual touching and attempted intercourse occurred without her consent. The complainant's evidence was corroborated by contemporaneous complaints, messaging, and accused's admissions. The accused's version was rejected as implausible and unsupported. All offence elements were established beyond reasonable doubt.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Director of Public Prosecutions; Accused: Romolo Giuseppe Mercuri De Figueiredo
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Judge Alone Criminal Trial / Final Judgment/verdict
- Outcome
- Verdict of Guilty to Counts 1, 2 and 3.
- Legal Topics
- Use of Intoxicating Substance to Commit Indictable Offence, Sexual Touching Without Consent, Attempted Sexual Intercourse Without Consent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecution
Romolo Giuseppe Mercuri De Figueiredo
Accused
Procedural Posture
Judge Alone Criminal Trial / Final Judgment/verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused administered MDMA to the complainant with intent to commit an indictable offence
- 2 Whether the accused sexually touched the complainant without consent
- 3 Whether the accused attempted to have sexual intercourse with the complainant without her consent and knowing she did not consent
Ratio Decidendi
The accused intentionally placed MDMA in the complainant's drink with intent to enable himself to commit an indictable offence, namely assault, thereby lowering her resistance and facilitating sexual acts, and subsequent acts of sexual touching and attempted intercourse occurred without her consent. The complainant's evidence was corroborated by contemporaneous complaints, messaging, and accused's admissions. The accused's version was rejected as implausible and unsupported. All offence elements were established beyond reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
Verdict of Guilty to Counts 1, 2 and 3.
Orders
- Verdict of Guilty – s 38(a) Crimes Act 1900: Administering intoxicating substance to enable commission of indictable offence.
- Verdict of Guilty – s 61KC(a) Crimes Act 1900: Sexual touching without consent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment