Re Ronald David GreenhillEx Perte Myer (NSW) Ltd [1984] FCA 412

Re Ronald David GreenhillEx Perte Myer (NSW) Ltd [1984] FCA 412

Because the bankruptcy notice required payment of a sum exceeding the amount actually due and exceeding the amount for which the creditor was entitled to issue execution, and because the debtor gave timely notice under s. 41(5) disputing validity on that ground, the bankruptcy notice was invalid and had to be set aside despite the creditor's contention that the debtor had not been misled.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 December 1984
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application to Set Aside a Bankruptcy Notice / Reasons for Judgment and Order
Outcome
Bankruptcy notice set aside; respondent to pay the applicant's costs.
Legal Topics
['validity of Bankruptcy Notice' 'overstatement of Amount Due' 'notice Disputing Validity Under S. 41(5) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966' 'strict Construction of Bankruptcy Notices']
['bankruptcy'] ['validity of Bankruptcy Notice' 'overstatement of Amount Due' 'notice Disputing Validity Under S. 41(5) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966' 'strict Construction of Bankruptcy Notices']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy Application to Set Aside a Bankruptcy Notice / Reasons for Judgment and Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether a bankruptcy notice is invalid where it claims an amount exceeding the sum actually due under the judgment.' 'Whether the notice should be saved because the debtor was not misled about the overstatement after the creditor had told him the debt was $200 less than the judgment amount.' "Whether the debtor's notice under s. 41(5) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 made the overstatement a ground of invalidity."]

Ratio Decidendi

Because the bankruptcy notice required payment of a sum exceeding the amount actually due and exceeding the amount for which the creditor was entitled to issue execution, and because the debtor gave timely notice under s. 41(5) disputing validity on that ground, the bankruptcy notice was invalid and had to be set aside despite the creditor's contention that the debtor had not been misled.

Court Disposition

Bankruptcy notice set aside; respondent to pay the applicant's costs.

Orders

  • ['Bankruptcy notice set aside.' "Respondent to pay applicant's costs."]