Williams, L. v. Claude Neon Ltd [1982] FCA 176
The bankruptcy notice was invalid because it claimed an excessive amount for interest (from the date of issue of the summons rather than judgment), included unenforceable costs for which proper notice had not been given, and included subsequent certificate fees improperly; failure to specify interest and period further invalidated the notice.
- Parties
- Debtor: L. Williams; Creditor: Claude Neon Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Application to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice
- Outcome
- Bankruptcy notice declared invalid.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Bankruptcy Notice, Calculation and Inclusion of Judgment Interest, Inclusion of Taxed Costs in Enforcement, Validity of Amounts Claimed in Statutory Notices
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L. Williams
Debtor
Claude Neon Limited
Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Application to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bankruptcy notice claimed an amount exceeding the amount actually due under the judgment
- 2 Whether interest and costs were correctly calculated and properly included in the bankruptcy notice
- 3 Whether procedural requirements for enforcement of costs were met
Ratio Decidendi
The bankruptcy notice was invalid because it claimed an excessive amount for interest (from the date of issue of the summons rather than judgment), included unenforceable costs for which proper notice had not been given, and included subsequent certificate fees improperly; failure to specify interest and period further invalidated the notice.
Court Disposition
Bankruptcy notice declared invalid.
Orders
- Bankruptcy notice No. 609 of 1981 is formally declared invalid.
- Respondent must pay the applicant's taxed costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment