Mirvac Funds Management Ltd v Value Lodging Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 787
The notices of termination were actually received by Value Lodging at about 6:15pm on 30 March 2022 when an authorised Toga Group employee signed for them, so 30 March 2022 was the date of service. Because the leases and sub-leases defined "Month" as a named month, that definition displaced the calendar-month meaning otherwise supplied by s 181(1)(d) of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW); excluding the date of service, 3 named Months included April, May and June 2022, so vacant possession could not be required until 1 July 2022. Although the notices erroneously required vacant possession no later than 30 June 2022, a reasonable recipient would understand that vacant possession was sought...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceedings Concerning Validity and Effectiveness of Notices of Termination of Leases and Sub Leases / Principal Judgment on Amended Summons for Declaratory Relief and Vacant Possession
- Outcome
- Notices of termination held to be valid and effective. Plaintiffs held entitled to vacant possession by midnight at the end of 1 July 2022, subject to payment of Termination Fees in accordance with the leases or sub-leases.
- Legal Topics
- ['validity of Notices of Termination' 'calculation of 3 Months From Date of Service' 'named Month and Calendar Month' 'vacant Possession' 'mannai Principles' 'notice of Intention to Sell or Assign']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings Concerning Validity and Effectiveness of Notices of Termination of Leases and Sub Leases / Principal Judgment on Amended Summons for Declaratory Relief and Vacant Possession
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the date of service of the notices of termination.' 'What is "3 Months from the date of service" within the meaning of cl 18.3(d)(ii) of the leases and cl 19.3(d)(ii) of the sub-leases.' 'If "3 Months from the date of service" is 1 July 2022 rather than 30 June 2022 as referred to in the notices, whether the notices are nonetheless valid notices pursuant to cl 18.3(d) of the leases or cl 19.3(d) of the sub-leases.' 'Whether the notices are ineffective because of a failure to comply with the requirements of cl 18.3(b) of the leases or cl 19.3(b) of the sub-leases.']
Ratio Decidendi
The notices of termination were actually received by Value Lodging at about 6:15pm on 30 March 2022 when an authorised Toga Group employee signed for them, so 30 March 2022 was the date of service. Because the leases and sub-leases defined "Month" as a named month, that definition displaced the calendar-month meaning otherwise supplied by s 181(1)(d) of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW); excluding the date of service, 3 named Months included April, May and June 2022, so vacant possession could not be required until 1 July 2022. Although the notices erroneously required vacant possession no later than 30 June 2022, a reasonable recipient would understand that vacant possession was sought...
Court Disposition
Notices of termination held to be valid and effective. Plaintiffs held entitled to vacant possession by midnight at the end of 1 July 2022, subject to payment of Termination Fees in accordance with the leases or sub-leases.
Orders
- ['Declarations to be made in accordance with paragraphs 1(a) to 1(j) of the Amended Summons that each notice of termination is valid and effective.' 'Subject to payment by the plaintiffs to the first defendant of the Termination Fee in accordance with cl 18 of the lease or cl 19 of the sub-lease, as applicable, the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment