Australian Broadcasting Corporation and anor v Cloran, Paul S. & ors [1984] FCA 472
The warrants are invalid because they fail to describe the particular offences in relation to which the seizure is authorised, preventing the persons addressed and affected from knowing the exact object of the search.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Australian Broadcasting Corporation; Second Applicant: Christopher Wayne Masters; First Respondent: Paul Stanislaus Cloran; Second Respondent: Toni-Michelle O'Bryan; Third Respondent: Paul Deaves; Fourth Respondent: Maurice Arthur Polkinghorne; Fifth Respondent: John Jones
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Order of Review / Judgment on Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Application granted. Warrants quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Search Warrants, Certainty in Warrants, Section 10 and Section 70 of Crimes Act 1914
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
First Applicant
Christopher Wayne Masters
Second Applicant
Paul Stanislaus Cloran
First Respondent
Toni-Michelle O'Bryan
Second Respondent
Paul Deaves
Third Respondent
Maurice Arthur Polkinghorne
Fourth Respondent
John Jones
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Order of Review / Judgment on Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the search warrants are invalid for lack of certainty by failing to describe offences with sufficient particularity as required by law.
Ratio Decidendi
The warrants are invalid because they fail to describe the particular offences in relation to which the seizure is authorised, preventing the persons addressed and affected from knowing the exact object of the search.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Warrants quashed.
Orders
- Search warrants numbers 930 of 1984 and 512 of 1984 be quashed.
- Documents seized from 64 Westbrook Avenue, East Wahroonga to be delivered up to the District Registrar or nominee.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment