Associated Dominions Assurance Society Pty Ltd v Balmford [1950] HCA 30
By majority, the notice was invalid because under s. 55 of the Life Insurance Act 1945 the relevant date was the date on which notice was served, 3 May 1948, and the notice specified a period ending on 16 May 1948, which was less than fourteen days from service. Sections 36 (2) and 46 (a) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901-1947 did not cure the defect because the notice itself failed to specify the statutory minimum period required by s. 55.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal in an Action for Declarations and Injunction Concerning a Notice Under S. 55 of the Life Insurance Act 1945 / Appeal From an Order of Mc Tiernan J. Dismissing the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Upon an Admission in the Pleadings
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs; judgment for the plaintiff with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['validity of Statutory Notice' 'life Insurance Investigation Powers' 'computation of Time' 'acts Interpretation Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal in an Action for Declarations and Injunction Concerning a Notice Under S. 55 of the Life Insurance Act 1945 / Appeal From an Order of Mc Tiernan J. Dismissing the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Upon an Admission in the Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the notice served by the Insurance Commissioner complied with s. 55 of the Life Insurance Act 1945 by specifying a period not less than fourteen days from the date of the notice.' 'Whether the words "the date of the notice" in s. 55 meant the date appearing on the written document or the date on which notice was given by service.' 'Whether ss. 36 (2) and 46 (a) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901-1947 saved the notice where the specified period expired on a Sunday.']
Ratio Decidendi
By majority, the notice was invalid because under s. 55 of the Life Insurance Act 1945 the relevant date was the date on which notice was served, 3 May 1948, and the notice specified a period ending on 16 May 1948, which was less than fourteen days from service. Sections 36 (2) and 46 (a) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901-1947 did not cure the defect because the notice itself failed to specify the statutory minimum period required by s. 55.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs; judgment for the plaintiff with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed with costs.' 'Judgment for the plaintiff with costs, including costs of motion for judgment and of reference to the Full Court and reserved costs.' 'Declaration that the notice of 30 April 1948 referred to in the statement of claim is void and of no effect.' 'Injunction restraining the defendant,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment