Bundanoon Sandstone Pty Ltd v Cenric Group Pty Ltd; TWT Property Group Pty Limited v Cenric Group Pty Limited [2019] NSWCA 87
A binding oral agreement was formed on 19 February 2018 to vary the head contract and sub-contract, including extension of time and royalty changes. TWT's show cause notice and contract termination were invalid due to the varied agreement and breach of implied obligation of good faith. Cenric was entitled to retain 50% of royalties up to a cap of $3 million as construed by the primary judge.
- Parties
- Appellant / Second Cross Respondent: Bundanoon Sandstone Pty Ltd; First Respondent / First Cross Respondent: Cenric Group Pty Ltd; Second Respondent / Cross Appellant: TWT Property Group Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; Cross-appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Contracts, Breach of Contract, Implied Terms of Good Faith, Construction of Contract Terms, Liquidated Damages, Royalties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bundanoon Sandstone Pty Ltd
Appellant / Second Cross Respondent
Cenric Group Pty Ltd
First Respondent / First Cross Respondent
TWT Property Group Pty Ltd
Second Respondent / Cross Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether parties formed a concluded agreement to vary the head contract and sub-contract
- 2 Validity of TWT’s show cause notice and contract termination
- 3 Construction of the cap on Cenric’s entitlement to royalties
Ratio Decidendi
A binding oral agreement was formed on 19 February 2018 to vary the head contract and sub-contract, including extension of time and royalty changes. TWT's show cause notice and contract termination were invalid due to the varied agreement and breach of implied obligation of good faith. Cenric was entitled to retain 50% of royalties up to a cap of $3 million as construed by the primary judge.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; Cross-appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Cross-appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment