Gordon v Lever (No 3) [2020] NSWCA 44
The Court declined to vary the costs order because, although the Gordons had substantial success on the appeal, the right of carriageway terms ultimately ordered were an amalgam of both parties' proposals, the Levers' position in the novel circumstances was understandable, and the same considerations that informed the costs assessment at first instance did not justify an indemnity costs variation based on the offer.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application in Appeal / Post Judgment Application to Vary Costs Order
- Outcome
- No variation of costs order
- Legal Topics
- ['variation of Costs Order' 'indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Letter' 'right of Carriageway' 'easement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application in Appeal / Post Judgment Application to Vary Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal costs order should be varied so that costs are assessed on the ordinary basis up to 4 April 2019 and on an indemnity basis thereafter.' "Whether the Gordons' without prejudice offer dated 4 April 2019 justified indemnity costs from the date of the offer."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court declined to vary the costs order because, although the Gordons had substantial success on the appeal, the right of carriageway terms ultimately ordered were an amalgam of both parties' proposals, the Levers' position in the novel circumstances was understandable, and the same considerations that informed the costs assessment at first instance did not justify an indemnity costs variation based on the offer.
Court Disposition
No variation of costs order
Orders
- ['No variation of costs order']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment