Cisera v Cisera (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 1531
The proceedings were struck out because the Court considered that the application had not been finally dealt with and should not continue or be determined on its merits without a contradictor, while the plaintiffs refused to take the steps required to appoint a contradictor or bear the associated costs, leaving no alternative course.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Division 3 a of Part 3 of the Trustee Act 1925 for Approval of a Deed of Family Arrangement Amending the Terms of a Discretionary Family Trust / Mention Following Earlier Judgment; Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Proceedings struck out.
- Legal Topics
- ['variation of Trusts' 'constitution of Proceedings' 'contradictor' 'minors' 'proceedings Struck Out']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Division 3 a of Part 3 of the Trustee Act 1925 for Approval of a Deed of Family Arrangement Amending the Terms of a Discretionary Family Trust / Mention Following Earlier Judgment; Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the application should proceed further or be disposed of on its merits without the appointment of a contradictor.' "Whether the plaintiffs' refusal to take steps to appoint a contradictor left any alternative to striking out the proceedings."]
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings were struck out because the Court considered that the application had not been finally dealt with and should not continue or be determined on its merits without a contradictor, while the plaintiffs refused to take the steps required to appoint a contradictor or bear the associated costs, leaving no alternative course.
Court Disposition
Proceedings struck out.
Orders
- ['Order that the proceedings be struck out.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment