Ollis v Charlier [2006] NSWSC 330
Since the purchaser failed to settle after reasonable notice to complete was given, and failed to attend at the time set for settlement, the cross-claimants (vendors) were entitled to orders for forfeiture of the deposits in accordance with the contract.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceeding (cross Claim) / Judgment on Cross Claim After Dismissal of Originating Proceedings
- Outcome
- Order for forfeiture of deposit in favour of the cross-claimants; declaration and orders as per draft orders initialled by the judge.
- Legal Topics
- ['vendor and Purchaser' 'forfeiture of Deposit' "termination of Contract Due to Purchaser's Default"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceeding (cross Claim) / Judgment on Cross Claim After Dismissal of Originating Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether cross-claimants are entitled to forfeiture of deposits following purchaser's failure to settle under contract"]
Ratio Decidendi
Since the purchaser failed to settle after reasonable notice to complete was given, and failed to attend at the time set for settlement, the cross-claimants (vendors) were entitled to orders for forfeiture of the deposits in accordance with the contract.
Court Disposition
Order for forfeiture of deposit in favour of the cross-claimants; declaration and orders as per draft orders initialled by the judge.
Orders
- ['Order for forfeiture of the deposits paid under the contracts to the cross-claimants.' 'Order that the cross-defendant authorise the agents Porter for Property, Gunnedah, to pay the deposits to the cross-claimants.' 'Declaration in accordance with draft orders dated 31 March 2006.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment