Dunn v Quayle [2004] NSWSC 1237
There was no agreement by the vendors to forego performance of the special provisions. The vendors' communications made clear their intention to enforce the special provisions, and the plaintiff failed to show any waiver or variation by the vendors.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/cross Defendant: Garry Jon Dunn; Defendant/cross Claimant: Max Edward Quayle; Defendant/cross Claimant: Anne Sandie Quayle
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Purchaser's summons dismissed. Declaration made that contract validly rescinded. Purchaser to pay vendors' costs.
- Legal Topics
- Vendor and Purchaser, Contractual Termination, Subdivision Approval, Waiver of Contractual Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Garry Jon Dunn
Plaintiff/cross Defendant
Max Edward Quayle
Defendant/cross Claimant
Anne Sandie Quayle
Defendant/cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was an agreement between the parties to not enforce special provisions in the contract pending council approval of subdivision
- 2 Whether the vendors validly rescinded the contract due to lack of council approval
- 3 Whether the conduct of the vendors constituted waiver of the right to enforce the special provisions
Ratio Decidendi
There was no agreement by the vendors to forego performance of the special provisions. The vendors' communications made clear their intention to enforce the special provisions, and the plaintiff failed to show any waiver or variation by the vendors.
Court Disposition
Purchaser's summons dismissed. Declaration made that contract validly rescinded. Purchaser to pay vendors' costs.
Orders
- Purchaser's amended summons dismissed.
- Declaration that the contract was validly rescinded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment