R v John George BORG, Douglas John Frederick CARROLL, Wayne Frederick FEAR No.2.; FEAR: Verdict by Direction Application [2015] NSWDC 116
There is no legal or factual basis to direct a verdict of acquittal as evidence beyond the DNA profile match exists to implicate Fear, and established principles dictate the matter is for the jury to evaluate rather than the trial judge, particularly given the presence of circumstantial evidence connecting the accused to the crime.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Verdict by Direction Application
- Outcome
- application for directed verdict of acquittal refused
- Legal Topics
- ['verdict by Direction' 'dna Evidence' 'circumstantial Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Verdict by Direction Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a verdict of acquittal should be directed when DNA evidence is the only evidence connecting the accused to the crime' 'The sufficiency of DNA profile match evidence supported by statistics as proof of identity for conviction']
Ratio Decidendi
There is no legal or factual basis to direct a verdict of acquittal as evidence beyond the DNA profile match exists to implicate Fear, and established principles dictate the matter is for the jury to evaluate rather than the trial judge, particularly given the presence of circumstantial evidence connecting the accused to the crime.
Court Disposition
application for directed verdict of acquittal refused
Orders
- ['There is no basis in law or fact to direct a verdict of acquittal. The application is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment