Vietnam Veterans' Association (NSW Branch) v Specialist Medical Review Council [2003] FCAFC 41

Vietnam Veterans' Association (NSW Branch) v Specialist Medical Review Council [2003] FCAFC 41

Justice is served by making no order as to costs of the appeals, leaving in place the primary judge's order that the Council pay the Association's costs at first instance and leaving each party to bear its own costs on appeal. This is appropriate given the mixed success of the parties and the history of the proceedings.

Parties
Appellant/respondent: Vietnam Veterans' Association (NSW Branch); First Respondent/appellant: Specialist Medical Review Council; Second Respondent: Repatriation Commission
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 March 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Full Court Judgment After Appeal and Cross Appeal
Outcome
Appeal by the Association allowed, cross-appeal by the Council dismissed, no order as to costs of the appeals, primary judge's costs order left undisturbed.
Legal Topics
Veterans' Entitlement, Costs Orders, Appeals Procedure
Administrative Law Veterans' Entitlement Costs Orders Appeals Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vietnam Veterans' Association (NSW Branch)

Appellant/respondent

Specialist Medical Review Council

First Respondent/appellant

Repatriation Commission

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Full Court Judgment After Appeal and Cross Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Process of the Specialist Medical Review Council's review under the Veterans' Entitlement Act 1986 (Cth)
  2. 2 Whether the Council failed to apply the 'reasonable hypothesis' test correctly
  3. 3 Whether a request to the Council to review a Statement of Principles ceases once the Statement is revoked

Ratio Decidendi

Justice is served by making no order as to costs of the appeals, leaving in place the primary judge's order that the Council pay the Association's costs at first instance and leaving each party to bear its own costs on appeal. This is appropriate given the mixed success of the parties and the history of the proceedings.

Court Disposition

Appeal by the Association allowed, cross-appeal by the Council dismissed, no order as to costs of the appeals, primary judge's costs order left undisturbed.

Orders

  • Association's appeal allowed and consequential orders made (20 December 2002).
  • Council's cross-appeal dismissed (20 December 2002).