Valassis v McCabe [1999] NSWCA 373
There was every reason to justify the conclusion that Mr Valassis had habitually, persistently and without reasonable cause instituted vexatious legal proceedings against Mr McCabe, but Newman J had no jurisdiction to extend the order to McCabe Insurances Pty Limited, McCabe Wellings Insurance Brokers Pty Limited and Janet McCabe. The order therefore had to be set aside to that extent and replaced with an order limited to Mr McCabe.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Concerning Declaration as a Vexatious Litigant / Appeal Pursuant to Leave Previously Granted From a Judgment of Newman J
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order 2 made by Newman J set aside; replacement vexatious proceedings orders made against Mr Valassis in favour of Mr McCabe; orders 1 and 3 affirmed; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['vexatious Litigant' 'jurisdiction' 'supreme Court Proceedings' 'local Court Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Concerning Declaration as a Vexatious Litigant / Appeal Pursuant to Leave Previously Granted From a Judgment of Newman J
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the order declaring Mr Valassis a vexatious litigant was justified.' 'Whether Newman J had jurisdiction to make the order in favour of three additional parties as well as Mr McCabe.']
Ratio Decidendi
There was every reason to justify the conclusion that Mr Valassis had habitually, persistently and without reasonable cause instituted vexatious legal proceedings against Mr McCabe, but Newman J had no jurisdiction to extend the order to McCabe Insurances Pty Limited, McCabe Wellings Insurance Brokers Pty Limited and Janet McCabe. The order therefore had to be set aside to that extent and replaced with an order limited to Mr McCabe.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order 2 made by Newman J set aside; replacement vexatious proceedings orders made against Mr Valassis in favour of Mr McCabe; orders 1 and 3 affirmed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed.' 'Order 2 by Mr Justice Newman be set aside.' 'In lieu thereof order that the defendant shall not, without the leave of the Court, institute any proceedings in the Supreme Court of New South Wales or in the Local Court against the plaintiff, Mr Colin James Thomas McCabe.' 'Order that no existing...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment