Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd v Zepinic [2020] NSWSC 266
Mr Zepinic’s affidavit did not comply with s 14(3) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), and he failed to disclose all material facts and previous applications as required. The application had no merit and disregarded statutory requirements, thus had to be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave Under S 14(2) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (nsw) / Decision on Application
- Outcome
- Application for leave refused; applicant’s motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['vexatious Proceedings Orders' 'application for Leave Under Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (nsw)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave Under S 14(2) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (nsw) / Decision on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether procedures required by the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) were followed' 'Whether Mr Zepinic’s affidavit complied with s 14(3) of the Act']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Zepinic’s affidavit did not comply with s 14(3) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), and he failed to disclose all material facts and previous applications as required. The application had no merit and disregarded statutory requirements, thus had to be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave refused; applicant’s motion dismissed
Orders
- ['Application for leave under s 14(2) of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) dismissed' 'Mr Zepinic to pay Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd’s costs on indemnity basis' 'Gross sum costs order proposed under s 98(4)(c) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment