Auken Animal Husbandry Pty Ltd v 3RD Solution Investment Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1153
Leave is granted for the applicant's eight witnesses resident in China to give evidence by audio visual link, as practical and legal obstacles have been addressed, COVID-19 creates indefinite delay otherwise, and appropriate safeguards can ensure fairness in examination, interpretation, and integrity of evidence. The applicant's application for a notice order as a precursor to a freezing order is refused due to lack of evidence of a real risk of asset dissipation and sufficiency of undertakings already offered by the respondents.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application in Commercial Proceedings / Interlocutory Determination Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Interlocutory application for leave to adduce overseas evidence by video link granted conditionally; application for notice order refused; costs in the cause, with liberty to apply for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- ['video Link Evidence' 'international Evidence Taking' 'freezing and Notice Orders' 'fraud Allegations' 'lease Disputes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application in Commercial Proceedings / Interlocutory Determination Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether evidence of overseas witnesses can be given by video link from China under Australian and PRC law' 'Whether the conditions of COVID-19 pandemic and resulting travel restrictions justify leave for video link evidence' 'Whether appropriate safeguards exist for cross-examination and interpretation over video link' 'Whether a notice order restraining dealings with proceeds of farm sale should be granted as a precursor to a possible freezing order']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave is granted for the applicant's eight witnesses resident in China to give evidence by audio visual link, as practical and legal obstacles have been addressed, COVID-19 creates indefinite delay otherwise, and appropriate safeguards can ensure fairness in examination, interpretation, and integrity of evidence. The applicant's application for a notice order as a precursor to a freezing order is refused due to lack of evidence of a real risk of asset dissipation and sufficiency of undertakings already offered by the respondents.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory application for leave to adduce overseas evidence by video link granted conditionally; application for notice order refused; costs in the cause, with liberty to apply for reconsideration.
Orders
- ["Leave for eight witnesses identified in applicant's interlocutory application to give testimony by video link from Shanghai, PRC, subject to specified conditions regarding venue, presence of persons, document access, interpretation, and technical support." "Applicant's interlocutory process otherwise dismissed."...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment